IJR News — today's news from every side
Tom Gallagher This lawsuit could set a precedent on whether states can regulate what pro-life groups say about medical procedures.Dana Whitfield It would help if studies clearly showed whether the reversal protocol works or just gives false hope in a tough situation.
Marcus Bell Going after a charity with the first trial of its kind feels like government overreach on a medical debate.Tom Gallagher The state forcing a trial on this issue risks limiting access to information that some women might want after taking the first pill.Chris Dalton The state shouldn't decide which medical ideas charities can discuss in public.Maya Lindstrom This case will finally let doctors and scientists settle whether abortion pill reversal is real or just wishful thinking.Derek Foss Suing over abortion pill reversal claims might protect patients if the method lacks evidence but it risks limiting open discussion on all pregnancy options.Rachel Meyers The AG is overstepping by suing a charity for telling women about a reversal option that some have used successfully.Maya Lindstrom Forcing the first trial over this issue risks turning medical debates into court battles instead of letting evidence sort it out.Tom Gallagher Forcing a trial over this sets a bad precedent for regulating what charities can say about medical options.Tom Gallagher Forcing a trial here could limit what charities discuss about medical options and sets a worrying precedent for free speech.
