IJR News — today's news from every side
Elena Vasquez If the reversal treatment lacks solid evidence, the state has every right to stop charities from promoting it to vulnerable women.
Rachel Meyers The AG is overstepping by suing a charity for telling women about a reversal option that some have used successfully.Maya Lindstrom Forcing the first trial over this issue risks turning medical debates into court battles instead of letting evidence sort it out.
Tom Gallagher Forcing a trial over this sets a bad precedent for regulating what charities can say about medical options.Tom Gallagher Forcing a trial here could limit what charities discuss about medical options and sets a worrying precedent for free speech.Chris Dalton Doctors need to settle the facts on reversal safety before courts get involved in the debate.Priya Raman This trial sets a dangerous precedent by letting prosecutors decide what counts as misleading medical information.Derek Foss Pushing legal action against a charity for this sets a bad example for how states handle disputed medical options.Sam Okafor This lawsuit looks like an attempt to shut down any discussion of options for women who regret taking the pill.Rachel Meyers Courts should focus on whether the treatment works rather than letting politics drive the case.Sam Okafor Suing this charity over abortion pill reversal claims seems like the state trying to shut down options for women who regret taking the first pill.Derek Foss Suing this charity over abortion pill reversal claims feels like government overreach when women deserve all the medical options available.+7 Jared Kim Hg and General Atlantic did well unloading Gen II for that price, though I wonder how the integration will affect day-to-day operations.
